Right. We've had two days to discuss this and will update players if/when the situation changes. It is still very early to say anything that is set in stone, but we still want to keep players as updated as we can with what information we can.
In regards to concerns regarding privacy policy:
The ingame command itself has very strict policy regarding when, why, and by who it can be used, especially in regards to players. It does not exist for the sake of and is not used to read the private messages of players; it was created to gather information/observations of specific types of botting programs. We DO NOT log the ingame chat -let alone private conversations- which is why videos or screenshots are required for Community Watch reports.
It has existed for some time now and all previous Admins, DEVs, and GMs have used it without voicing any sort of concern toward the command.
Unfortunately to verify that all previous staff who have been able to use this command were aware of it, I am having to include an instance that was provided to me previously where Shane used the command to force a staff member to ban themselves. I apologize in advance for obscene language.
http://i.imgur.com/eHg70D4.png
http://i.imgur.com/wpaktLG.png
Forum-wise, the only staff who have access to PMs are those in an extremely small staffgroup who have access to the forum database. There is an exception in that, if a forum PM is reported by a user, it becomes viewable to GMs so that they can follow up on cases of harassment or hacking links/viruses being distributed.
With that being said, we have been so far unaware of any potential breaches of International Privacy Laws. While we still are not sure what law is being referred to in that instance, we have been made aware that our Privacy Policy is indeed in conflict with the command in question.
We will be using the time that we have to question and address players' privacy rights and our policies regarding it, including discussion of if that command is ethical, the procedures surrounding it, and if the command is necessary. I know that, during the ruleset rewrite, I had personally wanted to check the ethics and consistencies between our other policies and if our actions were consistent with them, but I failed to do so beyond the ruleset change. I personally apologize for that. While we would have preferred we be asked about it directly, concern is still concern and we will be following up on it.
As for deleted/removed posts, if you believe any posts were wrongfully removed (the post was not spam and was constructive + Civil/respectful) please contact one of us directly with the content of the post in question.
Thank you for your time, and thank you for keeping the topic somewhat civil up to this point. I know there are people who are
not happy right now; we will continue to take concerns on this matter that are constructive and at least somewhat civil/respectful.
- Posted on behalf of Rigaudon