KaiReborn
Youngster
The problem is that you see shiny pokemon as better counterparts when that shouldn't be the case. I wish the reduction had been to 1-32 to avoid future whining if the iv range is made wider in the future.
PewDiePie_Felix said:MantileStyle said:you are wrong, when you donate is the same as you buy, you spend money or sometim for the benefit you can get in pwo tokens, with tokens member that is the reason, nobody spend money in one game over get any benefit, that are the word more ignorant i read on this topic
Grab a dictionary and look up the meaning of DONATE and BUY. This may change your mind on the idea of tokens.
kaiser6tn said:Just because you're selfish doesn't mean everybody else falls under the same category. I honestly believe there would be players still donating even if staff didn't give anything as a symbol of appreciation, it would probably be a far lower number of players though.
growing difference in price between old shiny and new is pretty fair, ok.Parasfm1 said:I dont know why you are soo upset really i like this update but i dont understand things like "old player gain more with this" i don't thing that for exemple old player spend their time and money to get their shiny for exemple my case i spend like almost 2000 hours ingame to get mine and i still poor as i was now think that my actual shiny is decreased ofc it will be sad and unfair for me that spend time and you say that is only unfair for new players blablablabla just that, and for god sake you still can get a good shiny dont see the point but ok.
kaiser6tn said:Older players have been around for longer, supporting the game throughout both the good times and the bad times so why should they be affected negatively by a change that will balance the game in the future? Not to mention that most people suggesting that seem to have joined this year and I'm willing to guess that 6 months from now most of them will have left the game
kaiser6tn said:Older players have been around for longer, supporting the game throughout both the good times and the bad times so why should they be affected negatively by a change that will balance the game in the future? Not to mention that most people suggesting that seem to have joined this year and I'm willing to guess that 6 months from now most of them will have left the game
right, why should older players be affected negatively? because older players are beta testers too, not just new players.kaiser6tn said:Older players have been around for longer, supporting the game throughout both the good times and the bad times so why should they be affected negatively by a change that will balance the game in the future?
i agree with you to an extend, however new players buy memberships and pokemon too. and in a healthy gaming environment, for every new player that leaves there will be another new player joining, who might also buy a membership and maybe a poke or too.kaiser6tn said:Not to mention that most people suggesting that seem to have joined this year and I'm willing to guess that 6 months from now most of them will have left the game
killanaddict said:i expected this.
i.e. staff considers interests only of the veteran players? then what sense to the new players to continue to play there, when the abyss between them and veterans constantly increases with similar updates? notice, i don't ask anyone to give me all kind of shiny pokemons that i could be like old player at once, i just want to have the same opportunities with other players (veterans or new, it' doesn't matter) to catch the same pokemons or be affected with all other players, whereas players like you who recieved your own more or less don't feel about this update like me and other new players, who can't catch the same pokemons and need much more time to buy it. and you're telling there about egoism. nuff said
if staff consider that old tyme shiny poks are overpowered and disbalanced then why they don't weaken it all? what sense to leave old shinys invariable?