Orean
New Member
Mt. Silver, reputedly the most popular permanently-established training area, calls for a considerable amount of trips between the Pokemon Center. However, on-foot travel currently entails walking through several hours, also going through a maze-structured path on the first floor—a routine that players may find tedious if having to make constant trips.
An NPC transporter was added to the base of Mt. Silver (Silver Town) a while ago, as a luxurious crutch which can work in tandem with an escape rope: the NPC porter would be used to reach the 5th floor, after completion of the Mt. Silver mini-quest, and the escape ropes purchased could be used to make trips back to the PC. However, players seem to be off-put by the 15k fee charged by the NPC transporter, which has begged the question on how often players use this NPC; it seems to have a negligible presence at best, which is worth reassessing, as long as Mt. Silver is the most popular training area.
Repricing the transporter has been a point of discussion within the staff, but we agreed it's best to discuss/collect feedback with players before any changes proceed. While votes in the poll may help to project to us how often players may use it, verbal feedback is encouraged as well; it would be far more explanatory on your viewpoints, and revisional suggestions can be fielded better this way.
An NPC transporter was added to the base of Mt. Silver (Silver Town) a while ago, as a luxurious crutch which can work in tandem with an escape rope: the NPC porter would be used to reach the 5th floor, after completion of the Mt. Silver mini-quest, and the escape ropes purchased could be used to make trips back to the PC. However, players seem to be off-put by the 15k fee charged by the NPC transporter, which has begged the question on how often players use this NPC; it seems to have a negligible presence at best, which is worth reassessing, as long as Mt. Silver is the most popular training area.
Repricing the transporter has been a point of discussion within the staff, but we agreed it's best to discuss/collect feedback with players before any changes proceed. While votes in the poll may help to project to us how often players may use it, verbal feedback is encouraged as well; it would be far more explanatory on your viewpoints, and revisional suggestions can be fielded better this way.