SHINY IVs RESET [PLEASE VOTE]

SHINY IVS

  • I want shiny IVs to be 28 to 32 again.

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • I want shiny IVs to be 20 to 31 like now.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I want every shiny pokemon reseted to 1 to 31.

    Votes: 1 50.0%

  • Total voters
    2
  • This poll will close: .

KaiReborn

Youngster
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
1,037
Points
38
Website
theburningnotebook.tumblr.com
If you're following the concept of equality and equal chances, then every spawn change that came with the respawning project would have to be undone. However because players' personal interests haven't been affected that much by those spawn changes, it has never been mentioned. There is no coherence whatsoever in wanting things back to the way they were because it'd make things easier for you (note that this you is directed to the players who support the regression only because it makes it easier to have a shiny pokemon with 'godly' ivs - something which should have never been the case to begin with)
 

Nikola

Youngster
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
1,762
Points
36
Whole game needs to be deleted. Do this quickly while you have time left. You had a chance last year but you decided not to. more you wait more damage you are doing. but yeah, you may want to carry on the original plan. Just delete everything and start from the stracth. FOundation has to be built on something. The game will be wiped regarldess, however you will need to do it in time. Game wipe cannot be avoided. Not without pissing everyone of and spending years into endless debates.
 

BossGiovanni

New Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2014
Messages
33
Points
6
DeenZinHo said:
I agree with Amelia, played at the time of the ancient IVs 28-32, the amount of players who had at the time was much more of today, and the new players are being hurt with IVs system 20-31, as they have to sell their Pokes by ridiculous values, while the old sell their by absurd values, this ends up generating a huge disadvantage, and this eventually leads many new players do not make a donation to the server in return for acquiring the membership to hunt Poke, it has no advantage being that no use trying to sell.

Many players, old and new stopped playing because of the new IVs 20-31, and what we really want is the server with more and more players and that these players make their donations, and strive to achieve your Poke or normal Poke in order to have chance to be the height of the old players.


Im not one to talk but with three forum posts its hard to take you seriously
 

DeenZinHo

New Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
4
Points
1
BossGiovanni said:
DeenZinHo said:
I agree with Amelia, played at the time of the ancient IVs 28-32, the amount of players who had at the time was much more of today, and the new players are being hurt with IVs system 20-31, as they have to sell their Pokes by ridiculous values, while the old sell their by absurd values, this ends up generating a huge disadvantage, and this eventually leads many new players do not make a donation to the server in return for acquiring the membership to hunt Poke, it has no advantage being that no use trying to sell.

Many players, old and new stopped playing because of the new IVs 20-31, and what we really want is the server with more and more players and that these players make their donations, and strive to achieve your Poke or normal Poke in order to have chance to be the height of the old players.


Im not one to talk but with three forum posts its hard to take you seriously







Only you check the date I entered the forum will see that I am a former player, I my opinion when the topic debate a subject that is to improve the game. I'm not simply responding every topic I see ahead.
 

Amelia

New Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
52
Points
6
Guys, everyone is welcome to post their opinion. Posts does not matter, what are you talking about? I've already said that both staff and players are able to determinate if the feedback is constructive, troll or whatever else. Please discuss. :D
 

FaMe

New Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
47
Points
6
Nikola said:
Whole game needs to be deleted. Do this quickly while you have time left. You had a chance last year but you decided not to. more you wait more damage you are doing. but yeah, you may want to carry on the original plan. Just delete everything and start from the stracth. FOundation has to be built on something. The game will be wiped regarldess, however you will need to do it in time. Game wipe cannot be avoided. Not without pissing everyone of and spending years into endless debates.

or that or leave it how it is and burn in hell >:D
 

mihay9245

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
204
Points
16
would be nice if we got some good update for 1 time annnd maybe game reset ... old ivs new ivs...1 of these should not existed
 

Alexei

New Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
41
Points
6
I can't see any changes happening. Staff rarely does anything what majority of players suggests and vote for. They will stay firm with their own opinion ignoring what's optimal and what's real according to players. Similar opinion and culture resulted in this whole mess, when staff thinks that they are smarter than hundreds of players. Analyzing everything until now and doing a simple math, you deserve everything that is happening to you and more will come. No one should feel sorry for majority of staff members. You are not helping to yourself my dear staff, don't expect sugarcoating from anyone. I am well aware that some of you are indeed not in position to change anything or have some influence but the fact is that you represent the staff as being one of them. As for this topic, as I already have said, I can't see anything happening with IVs. So far what I could notice is mercyless torture of players. Allowing to players to play on such system is really bad from your side. You know how to punish someone when they bot or scam, you don't punish yourself for treating people like this. Something does not match here. No offense staff but I am stating the fact what happening. Zero bias and hate towards you.

I would personally like to see a change on better but at the moment is more like waste of time suggesting anything because staff are always recovering and they are always hurt and uncertain. Too bad there is so little of team work between staff. There are some good staff members and I hope they won't leave because of several others not so good ones.
 

Amelia

New Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
52
Points
6
It's to see what people think about this matter. No one is forcing anyone to do changes. I also like how more people voted for 1 to 31 than 20 to 31. This is awesome for a beginning.
 

Mortyh

New Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
77
Points
8
Seems the quiz results started to show what the community really think. :) This is awesome for a beginning.
 

Amelia

New Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
52
Points
6
Poll ended yesterday. I was busy with lately so could not come sooner. I would appreciate if newer players can give their feedback too. Thanks!
 

LeroyGarcia

Youngster
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
1,081
Points
36
Newer players will always be at a disadvantage just like in many other online games that contain tradeable items and just like in real life also. The question here is not to create some type of socialist feature were we are forced to go through a more equal distribution phase but rather to make it easier for those new players to adapt and compete to the best of their knowledge with the rest. One way this can be achieved is by lowering the rarity of some of the HR and VR pokes which quite a few are of battle material. More tms and abilities can also level the field "battle-wise" in the game. Remember that when we talk about equality it is about battle potential and not necessarily a player's wealth. Cheers.
 

Mega.S

New Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
754
Points
16
An Ivs reset dont make any sence, becouse people who who got pokemons with good ivs work for it, an ivs reset is like a scamme to him.
This is a beta game and is normal get changes but you never can go take some from the "old" players becouse they suporte the game since a long time ago.
And each time game have less pokemons with ivs 28+ becouse players who got it left the game for some reasons like, work, family... we cant play forever.. xD
And you new players can get shinys with good ivs just with a lower rate, game is fun now and all people can enjoy it..
 

LinkBros

New Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
12
Points
1
I think that all shinys need to be 28+. It is so hard to find one and when we find it can be worse than normal ones if shinys are 1+. If shinys are 20+ its bad because old players will have better pokemos than the new players. So my vote is in the first option.
 

GloriousChar

New Member
Joined
May 24, 2013
Messages
115
Points
16
Even though, i don't like shiny ivs between 20-31 and i voted for ivs 28-31 before, i think it is too late to change the shiny ivs back. If 28-31 returns, the trade market will be severely harmed.

Old ivs gained worth day by day and continues to increase. If the ivs would reset to 28-32 so many players who collected old ivs will be harmed, money will gain worth again and every pokemon that is getting sold for expensive today will lose its worth. For example a regular shiny arcanine max spd(old ivs) is getting sold around 70m these days, i remember in late 2013, it was possible to find max spd S Arcanine around 15m.

I mean it would be better to see shiny ivs between 28-31 nevertheless in my opinion it is so late to change them right now.
 
Top